August 30, 2008
-
90 percent.
this story is beautiful.
btw, 90 percent of babies diagnosed prenatally with down's syndrome are aborted.
how can anyone argue that this particular practice is not a classic example of the weak being systematically destroyed?
=====
btw, read this article
about the dirty tricks the Obama campaign is doing (of course, you
won't hear this from the mainstream media). this dude is an
ultra-partisan, old-style politician, plain and simple. nothing in his
record states otherwise. America, please stop being fooled by this
"change" rhetoric.with the exception of his wife, there was not one person at the DNC who
stated anything along the lines of "I know Barack Obama. I've fought
and stood with him. You can trust him." (take note of the stark
contrast when the RNC takes place this coming week). the basic cry from
people like Biden and the Clintons was "hey, he's a Democrat like us,
please vote for him." in his acceptance speech, Obama mentioned nothing
about what he's done. he spent a lot more time attacking John McCain
(yup, that's the new-style politics for you), and his main statement
about his qualifications was, "I'm a Democrat, just like FDR and Truman
were. therefore, I must be qualified."i mean, if you were hiring an executive to run a company, would you
hire a guy with ZERO experience running anything, and no worthy
references whatsoever? would you hire him simply because he was an
amazing speaker who made all these spectacular promises, but had no
proof that he could deliver on them? no one would take you seriously.ladies, would you commit to a guy that was all talk and no past actions
just because he had a smooth tongue? well, maybe you would at first,
but in the end you'd end up with a broken heart or you'd end up
marrying a loser. haha.gimme a break.
Comments (5)
the dems can't put anything together besides calling mccain 4 more years of bush just because he's GOP. they also take everything he says out of context (i.e. "5 mill = rich"). gotta give them credit though. they make obama seem like whatever he's saying is the word of some god.
i'm sorry, but i respectfully disagree. you absolutely cannot say anything about obama's experience now that palin's on the ticket. her resume does not qualify her to be ready to lead should anything happen to mccain. she may hold conservative views, but that doesn't mean that she has what it takes to tackle washington. and, the right would be all over any candidate that had a pregant teenage daughter if it weren't someone on their ticket.
hi connie, my favorite ECG!
about your points.. i'll try to write more later, but palin actually has much more experience than obama, whether you're talking executive experience, foreign policy experience, reformer experience.. frankly, it makes obama's lack of experience that much more embarrassing.
about your last sentence, i don't think you're being fair. sure, we have our judgmental and extreme and hypocritical factions (sad but true), but as a whole, us conservatives are not as self-righteous as we are often caricatured to be. i'd like to think that the vast majority on our side would not judge any poiltician and his/her teenage daughter.
Ok...I haven't followed politics in a while...but...ok..national review has to be the most conservative publication in the country, with the new york post following a close 2nd. So I don't know if its an objective view on Obama's track record - its just a reflection on how people don't always make the right choices in making friends. Its not fair to see a guy as a reflection of his friends - Jesus hung out with the dregs of society and called them friends, but we don't see Jesus as a reflection of who he chose to hang out with. That point aside...
politics is dirty, no matter what country you goto. By the time people are "experienced" enough, they've gotten down and dirty, learned all the political ropes, and lose the idealism that they once started their careers with - same old problems that never seems to get fixed. Although he is inexperienced, he has potential and succeeded through his hard work. We saw what experience and conservatism netted us with GWB. I think even though Barack lacks experience, we need to vote based on potential in this election. Barack is charismatic, well spoken (in scripted speeches), educated and says the right things. I'm sure with his intelligence and his ability to get elected for the senate, that he knows a thing or two about American politics and has an idea of how it should be run. bill clinton never had foreign policy experience but did a superb job (in my opinion, the best since nixon). its kind of like taking adrian peterson over stephen jackson - do you go with the HUGE upside and settling for great numbers? or do you just go with what you know youre going to get, which is great, but that's all its going to be.
my fellow koo, your last analogy cracked me up. your analogy about Jesus is just plain whack, jack. you're hilarious
Comments are closed.