Month: September 2008

  • mets fans...

    ...faith is not believing when it's so obvious that it's going to happen.
    Faith is believing even when the outlook is bleak, when it appears that the clock will strike midnight, when memories of last September haunt us, when our team can't score a run from 3rd with nobody out in the bottom of the 9th, when our bullpen is impossibly bad, when the schedule is not in our favor, when it could rain all weekend, when a poor Pedro toes the rubber tonight against Rich Harden...

    ok, i'll stop. LGM! Ya Gotta Believe!!!

  • WIRE message

    this past Friday Night WIRE was awesome!
    and i'm excited to post my message online for the first time!
    enjoy ;)

  • piper on voting one way

    i will write more on the issue later, but here's what John Piper wrote back in 1995. i totally agree, of course.

    (Piper also delivered a sermon last year about how abortion is racism.)

    One-Issue Politics, One-Issue Marriage, and the Humane Society

    By John Piper

    January 1, 1995

     


    Investigating
    dog life in Minnesota has solidified my decision to vote against those
    who endorse the right to abortion. So then what is my response to the
    charge of being a one-issue voter?

    No endorsement of any single
    issue qualifies a person to hold public office. Being pro-life does not
    make a person a good governor, mayor, or president. But there are
    numerous single issues that disqualify a person from public office. For
    example, any candidate who endorsed bribery as a form of government
    efficiency would be disqualified, no matter what his party or platform
    was. Or a person who endorsed corporate fraud (say under $50 million)
    would be disqualified no matter what else he endorsed. Or a person who
    said that no black people could hold office—on that single issue alone
    he would be unfit for office. Or a person who said that rape is only a
    misdemeanor—that single issue would end his political career. These
    examples could go on and on. Everybody knows a single issue that for
    them would disqualify a candidate for office.

    It's the same with
    marriage. No one quality makes a good wife or husband, but some
    qualities would make a person unacceptable. For example, back when I
    was thinking about getting married, not liking cats would not have
    disqualified a woman as my wife, but not liking people would. Drinking
    coffee would not, but drinking whiskey would. Kissing dogs wouldn't,
    but kissing the mailman would. And so on. Being a single-issue fiancé
    does not mean that only one issue matters. It means that some issues
    may matter enough to break off the relationship.

    So it is with
    politics. You have to decide what those issues are for you. What do you
    think disqualifies a person from holding public office? I believe that
    the endorsement of the right to kill unborn children disqualifies a
    person from any position of public office. It's simply the same as
    saying that the endorsement of racism, fraud, or bribery would
    disqualify him—except that child-killing is more serious than those.

    When
    we bought our dog at the Humane Society, I picked up a brochure on the
    laws of Minnesota concerning animals. Statute 343.2, subdivision 1
    says, "No person shall . . . unjustifiably injure, maim, mutilate or
    kill any animal." Subdivision 7 says, "No person shall willfully
    instigate or in any way further any act of cruelty to any animal." The
    penalty: "A person who fails to comply with any provision of this
    section is guilty of a misdemeanor."

    Now this set me to
    pondering the rights of the unborn. An eight-week-old human fetus has a
    beating heart, an EKG, brain waves, thumb-sucking, pain sensitivity,
    finger-grasping, and genetic humanity, but under our present laws is
    not a human person with rights under the 14th Amendment, which says
    that "no state shall deprive any person of life . . . without due
    process of law." Well, I wondered, if the unborn do not qualify as
    persons, it seems that they could at least qualify as animals, say a
    dog, or at least a cat. Could we not at least charge abortion clinics
    with cruelty to animals under Statute 343.2, subdivision 7? Why is it
    legal to "maim, mutilate and kill" a pain-sensitive unborn human being
    but not an animal?

    These reflections have confirmed my
    conviction never to vote for a person who endorses such an evil—even if
    he could balance the budget tomorrow and end all taxation.

  • pro-death, pro-infanticide

    regardless of what you think about Barack Obama, there is no denying
    this: despite his constant equivocations about abortion, he is the most extreme pro-abortion mainstream presidential
    candidate in American history. his radical stances on this issue comprise the main reason for why I am praying that he will not be our next president.

    obama's speech before Planned Parenthood in July 2007:

    the Freedom of Choice act, to which he refers to, would overturn all 300+ local, state, and federal abortion restriction laws, including the ban on partial birth abortion (yes, this is the heinous procedure in which a baby is halfway-delivered, pierced in the skull, and then has his brains sucked out).

    another telling video:

    While he was an Illinois state senator, Obama voted against the
    Born-Alive Protection Act, which mandates medical care for babies who
    survive attempted abortions. Jill Stanek, a nurse who testified
    concerning this bill, told of how she would hold these babies
    in her arms for hours, basically waiting for them to die. Obama
    actually chastised this woman for her testimony, and voted against the
    state bill, while a similar federal bill passed 98-0 in the U.S.
    Senate (yup that includes major pro-abortion senators such as Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein); also NARAL, the nation's top pro-abortion political organizaton, stated a position of neutrality). The plain truth is that Obama voted that it was acceptable to
    leave these babies born out of their mother's wombs to die.

    i've already detailed Obama's lies and double-speak regarding abortion.

    more info can be found here and here.

  • issues: the economy

    this whole article is worth reading, but this excerpt in particular caught my eye:

    Mr. McCain will lower taxes. Mr. Obama will raise
    them, especially on small businesses. To understand why, you need to
    know something about the "infamous" top 1% of income tax filers: In
    order to avoid high corporate tax rates and the double taxation of
    dividends, small business owners have increasingly filed as individuals
    rather than corporations. When Democrats talk about soaking the rich,
    it isn't the Rockefellers they're talking about; it's the companies
    where most Americans work. Three out of four individual income tax
    filers in the top 1% are, in fact, small businesses.

    In the name of taxing the rich, Mr. Obama would raise
    the marginal tax rates to over 50% on millions of small businesses that
    provide 75% of all new jobs in America. Investors and corporations will
    also pay higher taxes under the Obama program, but, as the
    Michigan-Ohio-Illinois experience painfully demonstrates, workers
    ultimately pay for higher taxes in lower wages and fewer jobs

  • yup

    Jonah Goldberg is one of my favorite conservative columnists. He reminds me of the classic cheerful conservative. (As Dinesh D'Souza wrote in Letters to a Young Conservative, we conservatives should always be cheerful because we know our ideas are right and they will win out in the end.). Love this most recent piece by him.

    Bold Prediction: We'll look back at September as the month Obama & Co. lost the election. He's self-destructing before our very eyes ("lipstick on a pig"? really?). The guy has never had to run a tough campaign in his life. Sorry, the Democratic primary doesn't count. All he had to was pander to the ultra-liberal base and he faced an opponent with high and already established unfavorable ratings, and even then, he probably would've lost to Hillary if the primary season was a month longer. Obama is like cheap jewelry; he looks great at first glance, but the more you leave him on, you end up with these ugly red marks on your ears.

    McPalin Rattles Team Obama
    The double-team strategy is a winning one.
    By Jonah Goldberg

    Barack
    Obama, a famous fan of pickup basketball, must recognize his plight:
    It’s two on one now. John McCain drafted Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the
    star point guard from the Wasilla Warriors, to double-team Obama.

    (McCain’s
    team doesn’t care if no one guards Joe Biden, who seems to spend most
    of his time yelling to the media, “I’m open! I’m open!” But when he
    gets the ball, all he does is talk about what a great player he is and
    dribble in place.)

    So
    after the halftime show of the political conventions, to strain the
    sports metaphor a bit further, it looks as if the change-up in strategy
    has Team Obama rattled and in danger of choking. Polls — the closest
    thing we have to a scoreboard — show that McCain, at least temporarily,
    has taken the lead. On Tuesday, the Real Clear Politics average of
    national polls showed McCain ahead by a razor-thin (and statistically
    meaningless) 2.9 percentage points. The USA Today-Gallup poll had
    McCain leading by a whopping 10 points among likely voters (and four
    points among registered voters), though that’s almost surely an
    overstatement.

    The McCain-Palin convention bounce also all but
    closed the ticket’s gender gap. According to Rasmussen Reports, Obama
    had a 14-point lead among women; now it’s three. According to the
    latest ABC/Washington Post poll, McCain now has a 12-point lead among
    white women.

    Still, there’s a lot of pressure on Sarah
    Barracuda. Called up from the political minors, she could yet wilt
    under the hot lights. But that’s looking less and less likely.

    The
    outrageous attacks on Palin out of the block (She banned books! She
    opposed family planning education! She’s a creationist!) are untrue.
    And the eagerness of the mainstream media to go after her family life
    has backfired as well. For instance, Hanna Rosin wrote sneeringly in
    Slate magazine of Palin’s “wreck of a home life.” Would Slate say that
    Obama, conceived out of wedlock to a teen mom, comes from a “wreck” of
    a family? I somehow doubt it.

    Palin’s more sober critics, mostly on the right, worried that picking
    her would undermine McCain’s claim to “experience.” Almost the exact
    opposite has happened. Thanks to the double-team strategy, Obama has
    found himself in the awkward position of sounding as if he’s running
    against the GOP’s vice presidential nominee. When Obama compared his
    own experience to Palin’s tenure as mayor of Wasilla (leaving out her
    current job as governor), he ran right into the pick the McCain
    campaign had set, leaving McCain a clearer path to victory.

    The
    more Obama has to explain why being a community organizer — or a state
    legislator, or a one-term senator with few accomplishments under his
    belt — is better preparation for the presidency than being a mayor or
    governor, the more he volunteers his own shortcomings when compared
    with McCain.

    Besides, on paper, Obama doesn’t stand up very well against Palin. All
    of the mythic themes of Obama’s political narrative — the ethics
    reformer, the bipartisan, the new kind of politician — look like
    press-release material next to Palin’s accomplishments. Obama voted the
    Democratic Party line more often (97 percent) than McCain voted in
    accord with President Bush (90 percent). In Washington, Obama’s
    supposedly “sweeping” ethics reform — which forces congressmen to eat
    lobbyist-provided meals standing up instead of sitting down — and his
    feckless reforms in Illinois make him look the Bambi to Palin’s
    Godzilla.

    Obama’s idea of ethics reform is to mandate clean sheets in the brothel. Palin’s is to tear it down.

    The
    most unsportsmanlike conduct in the days to come will be the search for
    Palin gaffes, of which there undoubtedly will be many. The media will
    call fouls on her that they never call on the other candidates. Over
    the last week, Obama misspoke and referred to his “Muslim faith” on
    ABC’s This Week and told a rally how excited he was to be in
    “New Pennsylvania.” Perhaps that’s one of the 57 states he once claimed
    to campaign in?

    And let’s not forget Biden, whose gaffes are the unavoidable byproduct of his limitless gasbaggery. Biden could shout on Meet the Press,
    “Get these squirrels off of me!” and the collective response would be,
    “There goes Joe again.” But if Palin flubs the name of the deputy
    agriculture minister of Kyrgyzstan, the media will blow their whistles
    saying she’s unprepared for the job.

    Fair or not, that’s how it works in the pros. But so far, it still looks as if the MVP title is hers to lose.

    — Jonah Goldberg is the author of Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning.

  • she rocked

    my favorite excerpts:

    "Our family has the same ups and downs as any other ... the same challenges and the same joys.
    Sometimes even the greatest joys bring challenge.
    And children with special needs inspire a special love.
    To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I
    have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming
    place for your sons and daughters.
    I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House."

    "We tend to prefer candidates who don't talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco."

    "While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor's office that I didn't believe our citizens should have to pay for.
    That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.
    I also drive myself to work.
    And I thought we could muddle through without the governor's
    personal chef -- although I've got to admit that sometimes my kids sure
    miss her."

    "Our state budget is under control.
    We have a surplus.
    And I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending: nearly half a billion dollars in vetoes."

    "And there is much to like and admire about our opponent.
    But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man
    who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform --
    not even in the state Senate."

    =====
    as a passionate blogger, i make mistakes. that attack on obama and his half brother was not fair (thanks jea for making me see that). i take it back.

    of course, i don't take back my belief that obama is inexperienced, wrong on policies, and a highly disingenuous politician. can someone tell me any 'change' he brought about while part of the chicago political machine?


  • love the ending...

    btw, watch the ad on my pal's xanga page. obama's quote at the end is quite damning.

  • brother obama

    one of obama's favorite sayings is how we need to be our brother's keeper. he repeated it at the Saddleback Forum with Rick Warren, and during his acceptance speech at the DNC.

    but obama's youngest half-brother, as found by Vanity Fair, lives in a hut in a poor town on the outskirts of Nairobi, Kenya. yup, 26-year old George Hussein Onyango Obama told Vanity Fair, “No
    one knows who I am. I live here on less than a dollar a month.” his shack measures six feet by ten feet, and yet he says that
    Barack Obama has done nothing to reach out to him or to help him. “I
    live like a recluse. If anyone says something about my surname, I say
    we are not related. I am ashamed.”

    so what has Barack said or done about his brother? absolutely nothing. and some of Obama’s supporters have basically
    accused the young half-brother of trying to benefit from Obama’s
    success. right, because this brother was seeking out the cameras and writers.

    George, it's too bad you don't live in America. because when Obama becomes president, he'd take care of you. but now, you just have to "Pull yourself up by your boot straps, even if you don’t have boots. You’re on your own."

    and just like his shady relationships with convicted felon Tony Rezko, and noted terrorist William Ayers, the mainstream media has not taken Obama to task for this revelation (they were forced to deal with Rev. Jeremiah Wright). meanwhile, revelations about Sarah Palin's TEENAGE daughter's pregnancy receive wall-to-wall coverage on CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, and they're shamelessly politicizing it by using one person (of whose story they know no details) to talk about the failings of the abstinence policy. gotta love democrats. i'm reminded of when they repeatedly shouted "WE WILL WIN!" at Paul Wellstone's funeral. they'll never stop at anything to earn political points.